What customers say about Coverbase: “Transparency into our third-party risk” “A real partner enabled by technology” “From reactive to proactive and predictive” “A decision before my coffee’s cold” “More predictive, less just doing assessments” “Better visibility, all the way to the board”

Agentic third-party
risk and security.

01 · Customers

The best companies trust Coverbase.

02Applied AI

Coverbase works across the whole vendor lifecycle.

Why Coverbase

03Product

One supplier record: Evidence. Decisions. Follow-through.

Each supplier signal has an owner and a next step. The evidence and reviewers behind each decision, in one view.

Explore agents
Supplier workspace
Work queue
4Supplier examples
2Need your judgment
1Connected record per supplier

Findings stay linked to their source and owner.

Review context · Security
Northstar Cloud
The evidence is linked, and your team decides the exception.
SOC 2 reportSecurity controls documented
DPA · clause 8.2Notification window: 72 hoursGap
Your clause playbookRequired window: 48 hours
Next actionSecurity reviews the notification gap before approval.

04Platform

Agents for each stage of third-party management.

One connected platform. Built for the work between intake and renewal.

Explore the platform

Autonomous IntakeProcurement sees the request and its open questions.

TPM-Bench v2

We built an industry benchmark for third-party management

Applied AI
+0.19Coverbase ahead of Claude Opus 5.5, the top frontier model on its own0.92 against 0.73, 95% interval +0.15 to +0.23, n = 331
44 of 46Cases without third-party submitted info where Coverbase did better, none worseAgainst Claude Opus 5.5
+0.30Coverbase ahead on cases with third-party submitted info113 cases, 95% interval +0.24 to +0.37; against Claude Opus 5.5
98%Cases where Coverbase passed every blockerClaude Opus 5.5 on its own: 85%

05Results

How Coverbase compares to frontier models.

Coverbase consistently scores higher than frontier AI models, including Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, on every group of cases below.

TPM-Bench results
Coverbase against frontier modelsTPM-Bench v2
0.92
0.73
0.68
0.64
0.89
0.34
0.28
0.18
0.92
0.61
0.52
0.47
All cases331 cases
Without third-party submitted info46 cases
With third-party submitted info113 cases

Mean case score from 0 to 1. The gray bars are Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, the top OpenAI model, on their own, with the same instructions and company documents. The last two groups split cases by whether the answer uses information submitted by the third party.

Data
CasesCoverbaseClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6 Astra
All cases (n = 331)0.920.730.680.64
Without third-party submitted info (n = 46)0.890.340.280.18
With third-party submitted info (n = 113)0.920.610.520.47

The difference comes from Coverbase’s AI harness.

It brings your vendor data, relationship context, submitted information, and research into each decision, under your own controls. Full leaderboard, scores by suite and method.

Applied AI

07Reasons

17 reasons to choose Coverbase.

What the platform does, and the work it takes off your team.

01

Agents review every supplier, not only the largest.

Your supplier network grows faster than your team. Coverbase puts agents to work on the research, evidence gathering, and review that sit between a new business relationship and a confident decision.

Security, financial, legal, and compliance evidence belong in the same record. In TPM-Bench, the cases a frontier model cannot solve on its own are the ones whose decisive fact is a renewal date, an open finding, an owner on leave, or a sanctions change held in Coverbase.

Score without and with third-party submitted infoFig. 01 · TPM-Bench v2
0.89
0.34
0.18
0.92
0.61
0.47
Without third-party submitted info46 cases
With third-party submitted info113 cases

Mean case score from 0 to 1, Coverbase against Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra on their own, with cases split by whether the answer uses information submitted by the third party.

Data
CasesCoverbaseClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra
Without third-party submitted info (n = 46)0.890.340.18
With third-party submitted info (n = 113)0.920.610.47